[egenix-users] mx base 2.1.0b5 ref count bug?

[David Rushby]

--- "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> Are you using the standard mxDateTime build or one
> with WANT_SUBCLASSABLE_TYPES defined...

Presumably "the standard", since I just built with 'py24d setup.py
build', making no attempt to enable special directives.

> ... (mxDateTime_Deallocate is only used by the latter)?

That's true in 2.1.0-2005-04-15, but not in 2.1.0b5.

> In any case, please try our latest snapshot:
> 
>
http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0-2005-04-15.zip
> 
> to see if that makes any difference.

I can't build it out of the box:
---
# py24d setup.py build
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 9, in ?
    import mxBASE
  File "/usr/src/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0-20050415/mxBASE.py", line 10, in
?
    from mxSetup import mx_Extension
ImportError: No module named mxSetup
---

If I copy mxSetup.py from 2.1.0b5 to 2.1.0-20050415, then the C
compiler can't find mx.h:
mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/mxDateTime.c:41:16: mx.h: No such file or
directory

Transferring all of the mx.h files from 2.1.0b5 to 2.1.0-20050415 seems
a sure way to generate a corrupt build, so I stopped there.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com